Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 703 F.2d 1284 - Maggard v. O'Connell

Maggard v. O'Connell’s Empirical Analysis

703 F.2d 1284 · 1983

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Wheeler v. City of Pleasant Grove (1984), Armstrong

12 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

2001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bishop v. Wood · City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Federal Power Commission, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., Intervenor · Abraham v. Graphic Arts International Union · Independent Bankers Ass'n v. Heimann · Munro v. Post

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A lower court is bound by the mandate of a federal appellate court as the law of the case and, generally, it is without power to reconsider issues decided on a previous appeal, [citation omitted] However, the issue must actually have been decided ‘either expressly or by necessary implication on that appeal.’ [citation omitted] The mere fact that it could have been decided is not sufficient to foreclose the issue on remand. ‘The doctrine unlike res judicata does not apply to points not decided on a previous appeal, even though they could have been.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.