Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 703 F.2d 17 - United States v. Nightingale

United States v. Nightingale’s Empirical Analysis

703 F.2d 17 · 1983

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2019

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

701983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 401

Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Shillitani v. United States · Eisenstadt v. Baker · Maness v. Meyers · Yates v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Defendants made a deliberate decision to refuse a court order to testify; they must now face the consequences of that decision”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.