Locks v. Gw Sumner’s Empirical Analysis
703 F.2d 403 · 1983
Citation profile
45 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2016 · most notably Lowenfield v. Phelps (1988), United States v. Ramirez (1988)
45 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Stone v. Powell · Cupp v. Naughten · Crist v. Bretz · Mayberry v. Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e do not wish to imply that an inquiry into the jury's balloting will never infringe on a defendant’s right to an impartial jury and fair trial. This would occur if the trial judge’s inquiry would be likely to coerce certain jurors into relinquishing their views in favor of reaching a unanimous decision.”), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 933 , 104 S.Ct. 338 , 78 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983); United States ex rel. Kirk v. Dir., Dep’t of Corrs., 678 F.2d 723 , 727 (7th Cir. 1982) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Advisory counsel is generally used to describe the situation when a pro se defendant is given technical assistance by an attorney in the courtroom, but the attorney does not participate in the actual conduct of the trial. In the co-counsel situation, the attorney may participate directly in the trial proceedings with the defendant (examining witnesses, objecting to evidence, etc.).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Supreme Court and this circuit have recognized the efficacy of hybrid representation to aid pro se defendants and protect the integrity of the trial process.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.