United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
703 F.3d 562 · 2012
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 20 U.S.C. § 1097 · 42 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 208 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Olano · McCarthy v. United States · United States v. Dominguez Benitez · United States v. Vonn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 11 “does not require that the district court spell out the elements of the charge in order to inform the defendant adequately.” Instead, a plea colloquy must, “based on the totality of the circumstances, lead a reasonable person to believe that the defendant understood the nature of the charge.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the District Court erred, (2) the error was clear or obvious, (3) the error affected [their] substantial rights, and (4) the error 'seriously affect[ed] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.