Bennett v. Donovan’s Empirical Analysis
703 F.3d 582 · 2013
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 14 district · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1709 · 12 U.S.C. § 1715Z · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · National Wrestling Coaches Ass'n v. Department of Education · Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. Von Eschenbach · Northern Air Cargo v. United States Postal Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“simply to identify a legal error and then remand to the agency.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]f a borrower lives substantially longer than expected, lenders could face a major loss.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“HUD is the government actor alleged to have caused appellants’ injury, and HUD is the actor that can provide relief — that arrangement is sufficient to establish that relief is likely” even if “perhaps [HUD] would decide no such relief was appropriate” (emphasis added)). To hold otherwise would place plaintiffs in a jurisdictional Catch-22: unable to challenge an agency action for lack of standing due to an alternative, yet hypothetical, agency action that itself is unchallengeable on ripeness grounds. 4 . This Circuit historically treated prudential standing as a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.