Bead v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
703 F.3d 591 · 2013
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46 · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty · Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · LOZADA · Kucana v. Holder · Dada v. Mukasey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he eguitable tolling doctrine . . . 'provides that in exceptional circumstances, a statute of limitations may be extended for eguitable reasons not acknowledged in the statute creating the limitations period.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.