Jacobson v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1992
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3182
Relies on Allen v. Charnes · Ierardi · Massey v. Wilson · Buffalo v. Tanksley · Schumm v. Nelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]his statutory provision recognizes the discretionary authority of the Governor to hold an accused prior to the issuance of the governor’s warrant until . . . criminal charges filed against the accused are resolved. In many cases the period of confinement under such executive hold may well exceed the ninety-day period of custody permitted . . . for confinement prior to the issuance of a governor’s warrant. Thus, the ninety-day period does not constitute an absolute maximum period of time beyond which no warrant may issue. [Citation omitted.]” Jacobson v. Sullivan, 703 P.2d 1293, 1296 (Colo. 1985).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Lane
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.