Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 703 P2D 608 - People v. Mathes

People v. Mathes’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
April 1999
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Stull v. People · People v. Honey · Smith v. Miller · People v. Estorga

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a statement is admitted pursuant to this section, the court shall instruct the jury that it is for the jury to determine the weight and credit to be given the statement and that, in making the determination, it shall consider the age and maturity of the child, the nature of the statement, the circumstances under which the statement was made, and any other relevant factor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"In recognition of the suspect nature of hearsay evidence, and in obedience to the legislative mandate, we hold that a trial court must give the cautionary instruction contemporaneously with the admission of this particular type of evidence, and again in the court's general charge to the jury at the conclusion of the case, and failure to do so is reversible error." (emphasis in original)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.