Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 703 SO2D 137 - State v. Andrews

State v. Andrews’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2001
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Varnado · 647 So. 2d 1250 - State v. Brown · 572 So. 2d 269 - State v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for concluding that probable cause existed. Manso, supra at 482. State v. Page, 95-2401 (La.App. 4 Cir. 8/21/96) , 680 So.2d 700, 709-710 , writ denied, 96-2352 (La.2/2/97), 688 So.2d 522 . A magistrate's determination of probable cause should be accorded great deference by a reviewing court. State v. Andrews, 97-2321 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/13/97) , 703 So.2d 137 . In considering a magistrate's finding of probable cause, the reviewing court must determine whether the totality of circumstances set forth in the affidavit is sufficient to allow the magistrate:”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.