State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2016
1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Riche · 608 So. 2d 639 - State v. Riche · 589 So. 2d 1079 - State v. Waguespack · State ex rel. Willis v. State · St. Amant v. 19TH JUDICIAL DIST. COURT
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When reviewing a sentence alleged to be excessive and lacking a factual basis, if this court concludes the sentence is otherwise supported by the record, the sentence may be affirmed without a remand for resentencing or supplementation merely for compliance with article 894.1 [citations omitted].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“parole eligibility is to be determined by the Department of Corrections pursuant to La.Rev.Stat. § 15:574.4”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. Mayle“without benefit of probation or suspension of sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.