Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 703 So. 2d 83 - State v. Stan

703 So. 2d 83 - State v. Stan’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2001
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · 441 So. 2d 1195 - State v. Belton · 626 So. 2d 707 - State v. Tucker · 682 So. 2d 713 - State v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Sec. 5 of the Louisiana Constitution prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures. Searches and seizures outside the judicial process, without prior approval by a judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, subject only to a few specifically established and well delineated exceptions.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A law enforcement officer may stop a person in a public place whom he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.