Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 703 SW2D 520 - Nesler v. Reed

Nesler v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2013

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Devereaux v. Smith · Grissum v. Reesman · Abramson v. City of San Angelo · 240 Mo. App. 492 - Bohannon v. Camden Bend Drainage District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A partnership is judicially defined as a contract of two or more competent persons to place their money, effects, labor and skill, or some or all of them, in lawful commerce or business and to divide the profits and bear the loss in certain proportions. The law never presumes the existence of a partnership, but he who asserts its existence has the burden of showing such existence. The plaintiff bears the burden of proof of presenting cogent, clear, and convincing evidence that the parties entered a definite and specific partnership agreement. A partnership agreement may be either oral or written, verbally expressed or implied from the acts and conduct of the parties themselves.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the absence of any discussion or agreement on the sharing of losses is not a minor detail. Any inference of the existence of a partnership drawn from the sharing of profits is far from conclusive, and this is particularly true where the parties, although agreeing to divide profits, do not agree to share any possible losses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.