Cook v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1987
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1408
Relies on Cameron v. Cameron · Crouch v. Panama Refining Co. · Middleton v. Murff · Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Fisher · Allen v. Woodward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The divorce decree, dated March 29, 1979, awards Sue Cameron “thirty-five percent (35%) of the gross present and future Military Retirement presently being received.” Sue Cameron is entitled to recover that thirty-five percent but not from the period from March 25, 1979 to June 25,1981. Therefore, we affirm that part of the trial court judgment awarding Sue Cameron thirty-five percent of the military retirement pay_ (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cook v. Cameron
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.