Montgomery Mall Limited Partnership General Electric Credit Corporation v. Montgomery Mall Limited Partnership’s Empirical Analysis
704 F.2d 1173 · 1983
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Dewees v. United States · Council of & for the Blind of Delaware County Valley, Inc. v. Regan · Dail v. United States · Milwaukee Typographical Union No. 23 v. Newspapers, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where no potential disputed material issue of fact exists, a summary judgment will not be disturbed even though the district court disregarded the procedure which should have been followed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.