Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 704 F.2d 678 - Center v. Schweiker

Center v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

704 F.2d 678 · 1983

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
August 2016
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2016

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 1631 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Morgan v. Finch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the context of an overpayment waiver depends upon whether incorrect payment to an individual resulted from: 10 (a) An incorrect statement made by the individual which he knew or should have known to be incorrect; or 11 (b) Failure to furnish information which he knew or should have known to be material; or 12 (c) With respect to the overpaid individual only, acceptance of a payment which he either knew or could have been expected to know was incorrect. 13 20 C.F.R. Sec. 404.507. We have interpreted this rule liberally, making it relatively easy for the Secretary to recover an overpayment:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No showing of bad faith is required; rather, an honest mistake may be sufficient to constitute fault.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.