Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 704 F.2d 829 - Global Van Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Global Van Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis

704 F.2d 829 · 1983

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
September 1994
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 49 U.S.C. § 10101 (Bus Regulatory Reform Act of 1982) · 49 U.S.C. § 10102 · 49 U.S.C. § 11701 · 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · ICC v. Parker · Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co. · Alamo Express, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission · International Detective Service, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The evidence supporting the Commission’s findings is not preponderant. Indeed, a skeptical evaluator might conclude that Bekins’s proposals are difficult to distinguish from what the petitioners label them: contracts to provide preferential service at a reduced rate. But we are not charged with administration of the Act. Congress has delegated that function to the Commission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"motor contract carrier” means — * * * (B) a person providing motor vehicle transportation of property for compensation under continuing agreements with one or more persons— (i) by assigning motor vehicles for a continuing period of time for the exclusive use of each such person; or (ii) designed to meet the distinct needs of each such person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he concepts underlying motor contract carriage--dedication of equipment, distinct needs, public interest, and service of the national transportation policy--are not defined by the statute. The Commission is given broad discretion to define these terms....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.