Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

704 F.3d 1010

Docket No. 10-15633.

Miles v. Martel

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted Feb. 15, 2012.

Submission Vacated Feb. 21, 2012.

Resubmitted Sept. 28, 2012.

Filed Nov. 21, 2012.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2012-11-21

2 counsel of record

Relies on Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.

Decided 2012-11-21

¶1Michael S. Romano (argued), Mills Legal Clinic, Stanford, CA, for petitioner-appellant.

¶2David Eldridge (argued), Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for respondents-appellees.

¶3Before: HUG, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5Having considered the parties’ stipulation and joint motion to vacate the court’s opinion in this case, the court orders the following:

1. The opinion filed on September 28, 2012 and reported at 696 F.3d 889 is withdrawn.
2. This case is ordered remanded to the district court with directions to enter judgment granting a writ of habeas corpus directing that Petitioner Miles be released from custody as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after entry of the district court’s judgment.
3. The filing of this order shall serve as the court’s mandate.

¶6IT IS SO ORDERED.

/704/f3d/1010 · .json · Public domain