Swartz v. Insogna’s Empirical Analysis
704 F.3d 105 · 2013
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
November 2022
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Terry v. Ohio · Pearson v. Callahan · Whren v. United States · Weyant v. Okst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The instruction to reenter the car might be considered a component of a motor vehicle stop because in a typical automobile stop occupants would be told to remain in their car.”); see, e.g., Johnson v. United States, 33 A.3d 361, 373-74 (D.C.2011) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“put in motion proceedings that rendered the defendant at all times subject to the orders of the court ... and foreseeably required him to incur the expense of a lawyer and the inconvenience and perhaps expense of multiple court appearances,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a post-arraignment defendant who is obligated to appear in court in connection with criminal charges whenever his attendance is required suffers a Fourth Amendment deprivation of liberty,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.