Danielson v. Flores

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 19, 2012.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2012-12-19

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2018

1 district ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-12-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Nancy Bonaccorso Clark, Borowitz & Clark, LLP, West Covina, CA, for Debtors-Appellees.

¶2Elizabeth Anne Schneider, Office of Rod Danielson, Chapter 13 Trustee, Riverside, CA, for Trustee-Appellant.

¶3Rod Danielson, pro se.

¶4D.C. No. 6:10-29956-MJ.

¶5ORDER

¶6KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

¶7Upon the vote of a. majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.