Murray v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
704 F.3d 23 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 46
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Franks v. Delaware · United States v. Bagley · Kyles v. Whitley · United State v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a showing that material evidence was withheld in a criminal proceeding would not alone be enough to establish that there was a fundamental error in the conviction, given the extraordinary nature of the writ of coram nobis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Even if the petitioner meets all three of the conditions in [this] test, the court retains discretion to grant or deny the writ, depending on the facts and circumstances of the individual case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[l]ike the three-part eligibility test, materiality is a necessary but not sufficient condition for sustaining a petition for coram nobis on a nondisclosure theory”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.