Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 704 P2D 568 - State v. Noren

State v. Noren’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2015

7 state decisions

401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Romero · State v. Jones · State v. Kazda · State v. Smith · State v. Lakey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant's motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence at the conclusion of the State's case in chief requires the trial court to determine whether the defendant must proceed with the introduction of evidence in his defense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “and is likely to affect the judgment of another in the transaction”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[the victim] would not have ... agreed [to take out the loan] had he known about the prior sale”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.