Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 704 P2D 853 - Butler v. Farner

Butler v. Farner’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2024

18 state decisions

8019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lindsey v. Normet · Friends of Chamber Music v. City & County of Denver · People ex rel. V. A. E. Y. H. D. · Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. Briggs · Gonzales v. HERRIS

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not address their argument because there is no evidence in the record showing that the defendants were required to post any appeal bond or undertaking under the F.E.D. statute. The defendants therefore lack standing to challenge the constitutionality of the provisions in the F.E.D. statute requiring litigants to post a bond or undertaking on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “'the cirenmstances of the particular case, weighing the right of the party requesting the continuance to a fair hearing against the prejudice that may result from delay'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The structure of the F.E.D. statute evinces a legislative intent to accelerate trial settings in order to provide an expeditious remedy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.