Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 704 So. 2d 1129 - Khan v. State

704 So. 2d 1129 - Khan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Rutledge v. United States · 634 So. 2d 153 - Sirmons v. State · Thompson v. State · Gibbs v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]oth statutes punish the same basic crime (i.e., the violation of a legal obligation to tell the truth), and differ only in terms of the degree of violation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Because both offenses seek to punish the same underlying act, appellant's dual convictions cannot stand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.