Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 704 SO2D 165 - Gillyard v. State

Gillyard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · State v. Frampton · 698 So. 2d 248 - State v. Bowen · 688 So. 2d 901 - Hill v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When an accused manages his own defense, he relinquishes, as a purely factual matter, many of the traditional benefits associated with the right to counsel. For this reason, in order to represent himself, the accused must `knowingly and intelligently' forgo those relinquished benefits. Although a defendant need not himself have the skill and experience of a lawyer in order to competently and intelligently choose self-representation, he should be made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, so that the record will establish that `he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with eyes open.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.