Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 704 So. 2d 300 - State v. Schaefer

704 So. 2d 300 - State v. Schaefer’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 852 So. 2d 1050 - State v. Bolden (2003), State v. Guidroz (1998)

39 state decisions

320199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Manson v. Brathwaite · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 571 So. 2d 603 - State v. Miller · 385 So. 2d 193 - State v. Davis · State v. Lavigne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “La.C.Cr.P. art. 489 provides as follows: If it is shown, on motion of the defendant, that the defendant has been prejudiced in his defense on the merits by the defect, imperfection, omission, uncertainty, or variance, with respect to which an amendment is made, the court shall grant a continuance for a reasonable time. In determining whether the defendant has been prejudiced in his defense upon the merits, the court shall consider all the circumstances of the case and the entire course of the prosecution. If it becomes necessary to discharge the original jury from further consideration of the case, the trial before a new jury will not constitute double jeopardy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whoever commits the crime of simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than one year, without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence, nor more than twelve years.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.