704 So. 2d 569 - Barton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2018
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. United States · Lockhart v. Nelson · Alexander v. United States · McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco · Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Ass'n v. Austin Products Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a general proposition, an appellate court should not retry a case or reweigh conflicting evidence submitted to a jury or other trier of fact. Rather, the concern on appeal must be whether, after all conflicts in the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom have been resolved in favor of the verdict on appeal, there is substantial, competent evidence to support the verdict and judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no more than appellant's propensity to commit offenses of the same general type, an issue expressly prohibited by section 90.404(2), Florida Statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morrow v. State“merely because evidence that is critical to the court's finding of sufficiency was improperly admitted”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.