Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 704 So. 2d 576 - Brookins v. State

704 So. 2d 576 - Brookins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2018

14 state decisions

70199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Moran v. Burbine · Lego v. Twomey · Fare v. Michael C. · 593 So. 2d 1049 - Aira v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “985.207 Taking a child into custody.— * * * (2) When a child is taken into custody as provided in this section, the person taking the child into custody shall attempt to notify the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the child. The person taking the child into custody shall continue such attempt until the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the child is notified or the child is delivered to a juvenile probation officer pursuant to s. 985.21, whichever occurs first. If the child is delivered to a juvenile probation officer before the parent, guardian, or legal custodian is notified, the juvenile probation officer shall continue the attempt to notify until the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of the child is notified.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]re not alone sufficient to justify reversal of the trial court's finding that [defendant's] statement was made after a voluntary waiver. Here, the trial court found the waiver knowing and voluntary only after personally observing the defendant and evaluating his testimony at the hearing. Likewise, the trial court had an opportunity to consider the testimony of the officers who questioned the defendant and a psychologist who evaluated him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A statement made after a waiver of rights can be admitted in evidence, but the burden is on the prosecution to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the waiver was knowingly and voluntarily made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.