Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 704 SO2D 606 - Elliot v. State

Elliot v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 634 So. 2d 618 - Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Herre · 75 So. 2d 291 - Melton v. State · 221 So. 2d 129 - State v. Parnell · State v. Padilla · Johnston v. Boram

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is uniformly held that an arrest, in the technical and restricted sense of the criminal law, is the “apprehension or taking into custody of an alleged offender, in order that he may be brought into the proper court to answer for a crime.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “be given notice by word or circumstance that he is being detained ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.