Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 704 So. 2d 621 - Bess v. Eagle Capital, Inc.

704 So. 2d 621 - Bess v. Eagle Capital, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2017

11 state decisions

60199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 625 So. 2d 1219 - Demars v. VILLAGE OR SANDALWOOD LAKES · Wray v. State · 279 So. 2d 883 - Balding v. Fleisher · 637 So. 2d 320 - United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Selz · 645 So. 2d 131 - Palmer v. McCallion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[G]enerally, collateral estoppel is an affirmative defense which must be raised in an answer. See Palmer v. McCallion, 645 So.2d 131, 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)("Res judicata and collateral estoppel are affirmative defenses that ordinarily must be pled in an answer or similar pleading."). An exception is made, however, where the face of the complaint is sufficient to demonstrate the existence of the defense. See Duncan v. Prudential Ins. Co., 690 So.2d 687, 688 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (affirming dismissal on grounds of res judicata and estoppel by judgment where appellant had specifically incorporated into her complaint the previous proceedings)....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.