Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 704 SW2D 93 - H.E.B., Inc. v. Morrow

H.E.B., Inc. v. Morrow’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1988
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dyson v. Olin Corp. · Allied Finance Co. v. Garza · Smithson v. Cessna Aircraft Co. · Ideal Lease Service, Inc. v. Amoco Production Co. · Olin Corp. v. Dyson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party who fails to supplement seasonably his response to a request for discovery in accordance with paragraph 5 of Rule 166b shall not be entitled to present evidence which the party was under a duty to provide in a supplemental response or to offer the testimony of an expert witness or of any other person having knowledge of discoverable matter when the information required by Rule 166b concerning the witness has not been disclosed, unless the trial court finds that good cause sufficient to require admission exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.