Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 705 A2D 887 - Commonwealth v. Martin

Commonwealth v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2017

13 state decisions

60199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Florida v. Bostick · Alabama v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A mere encounter [or request for information] need not be supported by any level of suspicion, but carries no official compulsion to stop or to respond. Ah investigative detention must be supported by reasonable suspicion; it subjects a suspect to a stop and a period of detention, but does not involve such coercive conditions as to constitute the functional equivalent of an arrest. [I]n order to determine whether a particular encounter constitutes a seizure, a court must consider all the circumstances surrounding the encounter to determine whether the police conduct could have communicated to a reasonable person that the person was not free to decline the officer’s requests or otherwise terminate the encounter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A stop may be proper where the tip is sufficiently corroborated by independent police work giving rise to a reasonable belief that the tip was correct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re JE

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.