Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 705 F.2d 123 - Dellolio v. Heckler

Dellolio v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

705 F.2d 123 · 1983

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
February 2016
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Johnson v. Bowen (1988), Rodriguez v. Bowen (1988)

33 federal appellate · 4 district ·

5101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Wiggins v. Schweiker · Walden v. Schweiker · Ferguson v. Schweiker · Strickland v. Harris · Gagnon v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is more than a scintilla, less than a preponderance, and is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e may not reweigh the evidence or substitute our judgment for that of the Secretary, but we must scrutinize the record in its entirety to ascertain whether substantial evidence does indeed support the Secretary's findings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “disabling effect of each of the claimant's ailments”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.