Howard v. Chrysler Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
705 F.2d 1285 · 1983
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1221 (Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Randy's Studebaker Sales, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp. · Salco Corporation, Formerly Known and Doing Business as Denver Buick, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation, Buick Motor Division · Hanley v. Chrysler Motors Corp. · 32 Colo. App. 384 - Comtrol, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & T. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to act in a fair and equitable manner toward each other so as to guarantee the one party freedom from coercion, intimidation, or threats of coercion or intimidation from the other party: Provided, that recommendation, endorsement, exposition, persuasion, urging or argument shall not be deemed to constitute a lack of good faith.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“act in a fair and equitable manner toward each other so as to guarantee the one party freedom from coercion, intimidation, or threats of coercion or intimidation from the other party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.