Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 705 F.2d 1326 - Correge v. Murphy

Correge v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

705 F.2d 1326 · 1983

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
February 2024
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2024

12019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102

Relies on Rodriquez v. United States · International Glass Co. v. United States · Radioptics, Inc. v. United States · Young v. Dworkin · 223 Ct. Cl. 594 - Radioptics, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he courts have consistently held that an invention, though completed, is deemed abandoned, suppressed, or concealed if, within a reasonable time after completion, no steps are taken to make the invention publicly known. Thus, failure to file a patent application; to describe the invention in a publicly disseminated document; or to use the invention publicly, have been held to constitute abandonment, suppression or concealment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(g) before the applicant's invention thereof the invention was made in this country by another who had not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed it. In determining priority of invention there shall be considered not only the respective dates of conception and reduction to practice of the invention, but also the reasonable diligence of one who was first to conceive and last to reduce to practice, from a time prior to conception by the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “must include every essential limitation of the count”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.