Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 705 F.2d 1445 - Ammons v. Baldwin

Ammons v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis

705 F.2d 1445 · 1983

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
December 2008
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2008

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

110198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Pierson v. Ray · Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. · Democratic Party of the United States v. Wisconsin ex rel. La Follette · Bart v. Telford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We inquire whether: (1) the offending action is a normal judicial function; (2) it occurred in the judge’s courtroom or chambers; (3) the controversy involved a case pending before the judge; and (4) the confrontation arose ‘directly and immediately out of a visit to the judge in his official capacity’. Brewer v. Blackwell, 692 F.2d [387] at 396 [5th Cir.1982] (citing Harper v. Merckle, 638 F.2d 848, 858 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 816 , 102 S.Ct. 93 , 70 L.Ed.2d 85 (1981).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “minimal level required to invoke federal jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.