Public-domain · open source

705 F.2d 800

Docket No. 81-1238.

United States v. Piccolo

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1983.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1983-04-07

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1997

8 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1412 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 29 U.S.C. § 794

Relies on Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Epperson v. Arkansas · Connecticut v. Mohegan Tribe

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-04-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Carl Ziemba, Detroit, Mich., for defendant-appellant.

¶2Richard A. Rossman, U.S. Atty., Ross Parker, Maura Corrigan, Asst. U.S. Attys., Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff-appellee.

¶3ORDER

¶4A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the ease on the docket as a pending appeal.

¶5Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment, 696 F.2d 1162, of this Court is vacated, issuance of the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal. The Clerk will direct the parties concerning the filing of supplemental briefs.