United States v. Armilio’s Empirical Analysis
705 F.2d 939 · 1983
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2009 · most notably United States v. Daily (1990), United States v. Gaudin (1994)
19 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Sinclair v. United States · Trammel v. United States · Armedo-Sarmiento v. United States · Brown v. United States · United States v. Koonce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ajlthough materiality is a question of law, its proper determination “depends on the factual situation in which the testimony was given.” The government must, therefore, introduce evidence of what the grand jury was investigating, and of what testimony the defendant gave.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in theory at least, no continuum of assurance and dubiosity as to the establishment of a proposition of law similar to the varying degrees of certainty and uncertainty which may be ascribed to propositions of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The standards of proof for making findings of fact are, however, simply irrelevant to the determination of materiality”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.