Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 705 F.2d 945 - Nebraska, Military Department, Office of The Adjutant General v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Nebraska, Military Department, Office of The Adjutant General v. Federal Labor Relations Authority’s Empirical Analysis

705 F.2d 945 · 1983

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
December 2021
most recently cited

24 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably Cousins v. Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation (1989), Professional Airways Systems Specialists v. Federal Labor Relations Authority (1987)

24 federal appellate ·

26019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 32 U.S.C. § 709 (National Guard Technicians Act of 1968) · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 5 U.S.C. § 7105 · 5 U.S.C. § 7106 · 5 U.S.C. § 7117 · 5 U.S.C. § 7119 · 5 U.S.C. § 7121

Relies on Morton v. Mancari · Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee · Watt v. Alaska · Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co. · Medlin v. Mann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “), set forth in Chapter 71 of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. Secs. 7101-7135 , codifies the collective bargaining rights of federal employees. The Statute also established the FLRA with functions similar to the National Labor Relations Board (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “do[es] not provide an affirmative expression of congressional intent to override the specific provision for exclusive review of section 709[(f)] matters by the state adjutants general in the technicians statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whatever action is necessary and not inconsistent with this chapter to resolve the impasse,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.