Mount Hope Church v. Bash Back!’s Empirical Analysis
705 F.3d 418 · 2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 248 (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · Snyder v. Phelps
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party or attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.