Roddy v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
705 F.3d 631 · 2013
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Clifford v. Apfel · Craft v. Astrue · Skarbek v. Barnhart · Schmidt v. Astrue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After careful consideration of the evidence, the undersigned finds hat the claimant’s medically determinable impairments could reasonably be expected to cause the alleged symptoms; however, the claimant [sic] allegations concerning the intensity, persistence and limiting effects of these symptoms are not credible to the extent they are inconsistent with the residual functional capacity assessment established above.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the agency has expressly endorsed the inability to pay as an explanation excusing a claimant's failure to seek treatment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Keiper v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.