Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 705 FAPPX 32 - Dunn v. URS Corp.

Dunn v. URS Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Chambers v. TRM Copy Centers Corp. · Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons · Williams v. R.H. Donnelley, Corp. · Smith v. Fischer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Circumstances contributing to a permissible inference of discriminatory intent may include the employer's continuing, after discharging the plaintiff, to seek applicants from persons of the plaintiff's qualifications to fill that position, or the employer's criticism of the plaintiff's performance in ethnically degrading terms, or its invidious comments about others in the employee's protected group, or the more favorable treatment of employees not in the protected group, or the sequence of events leading to the plaintiff's discharge, or the timing of the discharge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.