Frankel v. Slotkin’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78N (§ 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78P (§ 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. · Linkletter v. Walker · Goldman v. Belden · Bradley v. J. F. Batte & Sons of Richmond, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]hat argument fails to address the central issue, namely, whether the put was a 'purchase and sale' within the meaning of § 16(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Frankel v. Slotkin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.