705 F. Supp. 2d 21 - Gomez v. Aragon’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

23 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) transacting any business in the District of Columbia; (2) contracting to supply services in the District of Columbia; (3) causing tortious injury in the District of Columbia by an act or omission in the District of Columbia; (4) causing tortious injury in the District of Columbia by an act or omission outside the District of Columbia if he regularly does or solicits business, engages in any other persistent course of conduct, or derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed, or services rendered, in the District of Columbia!;.]”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 900 F. Supp. 2d 51 - Walsh v. Hagee · 58 F. Supp. 3d 27 - Amr v. Commonwealth of Virginia

2. “'the district court is accorded wide discretion' in determining whether sanctions are appropriate,”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Thec International-Hamdard Cordova Group-Nazari Constr. Co. v. Cohen Mohr, LLP · Ahuruonye v. U.S. Dep't of Interior

3. “These minimum contacts must arise from `some act by which the defendant purposefully avails [herself] of the privilege of conducting activities with the forum state, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws.’”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 841 F. Supp. 2d 364 - Atwal v. Myer