Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 705 NE2D 564 - Melton v. State

Melton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2014

18 state decisions

110199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Florida v. Bostick · Pirtle v. State · Jones v. State · Sims v. State · Snyder v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Olur standard of review when reviewing a trial court's ruling on the validity of a search and seizure [is that] we consider the evidence most favorable to the ruling and any uncontradicted evidence to the contrary to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the ruling.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the evidence is conflicting, we consider only the evidence favorable to the ruling and will affirm if the ruling is supported by substantial evidence of probative value.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[tlhe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.