State v. Lasley’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 18 U.S.C. § 13 (Assimilative Crimes Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1360
Relies on California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians · Bryan v. Itasca County · Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. · Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. · Negonsott v. Samuels
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The general theme of Iowa cases provides that, when a court is confronted of its own authority to proceed, it should take charge of the proceedings affirmatively, regardless of the vehicle used to raise the issue. The court should utilize the most efficient method at its disposal to determine the true facts and then decide the issue promptly. When the court’s power to proceed is at issue, the court has the power and duty to determine whether it has jurisdiction of the matter presented. Subject matter jurisdiction should be considered before the court looks at other matters involved in the case and before it determines whether the parties are entitled to a ... trial. The court should be less concerned about the form in which the question of subject .matter jurisdiction reaches it and more concerned about establishing an efficient, prompt, trustworthy solution, even if innovative and unusual approaches are required to reach the issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"(a) Each of the States ... listed in the following table shall have jurisdiction over offenses committed by or against Indians in the areas of Indian country listed ... to the same extent that such State ... has jurisdiction over offenses committed elsewhere within the State ... and the criminal laws of such State ... shall have the same force and effect within such Indian country as they have elsewhere within the State ... : "State or Territory of Indian country affected [¶ ... ¶] California .............................. All Indian country within the State." [¶ ... ¶]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.