Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 705 N.W.2d 768 - State v. Barker

State v. Barker’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2014

19 state decisions

14020052010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Taylor v. United States · Shepard v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Finally, several other mandatory minimum statutes were amended in 2005 to provide for sentencing juries and bifurcated trials at resentencing hearings. These changes affect . . . Minn.Stat. § 609.1095 (2004) (relating to certain dangerous and career offenders). Noticeably absent from this list is section 609.11.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “engaft[ing] sentencing-jury ... requirements onto the Sentencing Guidelines and sentencing statutes would require rewriting them, something our severance jurisprudence does not permit.” Shattuck, 704 N.W.2d at 148 ; accord Barker, 705 N.W.2d at 775-76 . Instead, we”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “because imposition of the presumptive sentence is mandatory absent judicial findings * * * the presumptive sentence is the maximum penalty authorized solely by the jury's verdict for purposes of Apprendi.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.