Wunder v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[T]he prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. By custodial interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Southworth v. State · Jelle v. State

2. ““ ‘It was the compulsive aspect of custodial interrogation, and not the strength or content of the government’s suspicions at the time the questioning was conducted, which led the Court to impose the Miranda requirements with regard to custodial questioning[.]’ ” ... United States v. Caiello, 420 F.2d 471, 473 (CA2 1969) [, cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1039 [ 90 S.Ct. 1358 , 25 L.Ed.2d 650 ] (1970)] [A]n objective, reasonable-man test is appropriate because, unlike a subjective test, it “is not solely dependent either on the self-serving declarations of the police officers or the defendant nor does it place upon the police the burden of anticipating the frailties or idio-syncracies of every person whom they quesüon[.” People v. P., 21 N.Y.2d 1 , 286 N.Y.S.2d 225, 230 , 233 N.E.2d 255, 260 (N.Y.1967).]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Southworth v. State