In Re Dc’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 289 Ga. App. 30 - In the Interest of J. L. H. · 300 Ga. App. 163 - Bynum v. State · In the Interest of J. L. B. · 277 Ga. App. 432 - Pinkston v. State · 223 Ga. App. 429 - In Interest of JB
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because this appeal is the earliest practicable opportunity for new appellate counsel to raise an ineffectiveness claim, we remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on that claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.