Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 705 So. 2d 1331 - Valle v. State

705 So. 2d 1331 - Valle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 68 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State (2002), 761 So. 2d 1055 - Freeman v. State (2000)

2 federal appellate · 68 state decisions

610199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Skipper v. South Carolina · 622 So. 2d 982 - Huff v. State · 573 So. 2d 293 - Medina v. State · 484 So. 2d 1239 - Harich v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Valle was convicted of first-degree murder, attempted murder, and possession of a firearm, and was sentenced to death for the murder charge. Valle v. State [ (Valle I) ], 394 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1981). On direct appeal, this Court reversed the convictions and sentences and remanded for a new trial. Id. On retrial in 1981, Valle was again convicted on those three counts and again sentenced to death. The convictions and sentences were affirmed by this Court in Valle v. State [(Valle II)], 474 So.2d 796, 806 (Fla.1985). The United States Supreme Court subsequently vacated Valle’s death sentence and remanded the case to this Court for further consideration in light of Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1 , 106 S.Ct. 1669 , 90 L.Ed.2d 1 (1986), regarding the admissibility of model prisoner testimony. Valle v. Florida, 476 U.S. 1102 , 106 S.Ct. 1943 , 90 L.Ed.2d 353 (1986). We remanded for a new sentencing hearing before a new jury. Valle v. State [ (Valle III)), 502 So.2d 1225 (Fla.1987).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The choice by counsel to present or not present evidence in mitigation is a tactical decision properly within counsel's discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “a brief statement of facts (and other conditions) relied on in support of the motion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.