705 So. 2d 1376 - JB v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State (2000), 852 So. 2d 226 - FB v. State (2003)
60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 365 So. 2d 701 - Castor v. State · Davis v. State · 616 So. 2d 1 - State v. Johnson · State v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“goes to the foundation of the case or the merits of the cause of action and is equivalent to a denial of due process.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bailey v. State · Johnson v. State“for an error to be so fundamental that it can be raised for the first time on appeal, the error must be basic to the judicial decision under review and equivalent to a denial of due process”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“prohibits counsel from attempting to gain a tactical advantage by allowing unknown errors to go undetected and then seeking a second trial if the first decision is adverse to the client.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. King v. State · State v. TG
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.